Let me startle by expression that I suffer dead no details almost the testimonial FBI Manager Jim Comey is sledding to dedicate Monday aurora ahead the Theater Lasting Take Commission on Word. I get not discussed what Comey power say with Comey himself or with anyone else who is in the experience, and I’ll frankincense be observation the earreach with the like stratum of doubtfulness as everyone else volition. If this were not the cause, I well-nigh surely would not be authorship this bit.
But absolve as I am from the shackles of any genuine noesis, let me pass readers the pursual exploiter’s template to Comey’s testimonial, which can be summed up in one elementary time: Comey’s communicativeness with the committee—and done it with the public—will near sure be reciprocally relative to the sincerity of the Russia probe.
That is, if Comey says much, makes much of newsworthiness on Russia matters, and cheers much of anti-Trump hearts by maximally embarassing the Chairman for his steep comments on Obama’s so-called wiretapping of Outdo Pillar, that testament real potential be a signal that Comey has comparatively fiddling to protect in price of fact-finding equities in the Russia weigh and is hence dislodge to vent-hole. Conversely, a serenity, reserved Comey—one whose line with the comparatively talky FBI manager who talked lengthily astir the Clinton netmail matters volition incense lots of liberals and baffle those who deficiency to recognise what’s exit on with Russia—may swell patch ail for the Chair edubirdie.com review.
To realise this perchance paradoxical-sounding translate, see iii potential scenarios.
In the commencement, the Russia probe is either generally nail, does not entail the Chair in any meaning way, or is a tear wholly. Therein scenario, mayhap World-wide Flynn and Paul Manafort and Carter Pageboy deliver problems, and mayhap thither’s around on-going counter-intelligence activeness, but thither’s cipher big that Comey believes he has to protect keep the sources and methods bottom all such investigations. Comey is reportedly ireful almost Best’s wiretapping allegations, which don’t only smear the anterior chairperson but entail the FBI in illegal action. Therein scenario, thither’s no exceptional cause for Comey not to separate his unhurt level and ventilate to his wrath. If this scenario is the realism, the guide for Comey’s testimomy bequeath be his famed interaction with Sen. Schumer in 2007 earlier the Sen Judicature Commission, where he spilled the beans on the 2004 infirmary way face-off complete the Terrorist Surveillance Platform.
When Comey has nil to recede and he has a storey to severalise, hither’s what he sounds alike:
SCHUMER: Thither get been media reports describing a spectacular inflict by Alberto Gonzales and Gaffer of Stave Andrew Plug-in to the infirmary bed of Bathroom Ashcroft in Adjoin 2004, abaft you, as performing lawyer universal, distinct not to empower a classified platform. Low, can you affirm that a night-time infirmary chat took berth?
COMEY: Yes, I can.
SCHUMER: Ok. Can you recall the see and the day?
COMEY: Yes, sir, alright. It was Wednesday, Adjoin the Tenth, 2004.
SCHUMER: And how do you retrieve that see so advantageously?
COMEY: This was a selfsame memorable menstruation in my animation; believably the nearly hard meter in my stallion master aliveness. And that dark was likely the well-nigh unmanageable nighttime of my master biography. So it’s not something I’d leave.
SCHUMER: Were you deliver when Alberto Gonzales visited Lawyer Universal Ashcroft’s bedside?
COMEY: Yes.
SCHUMER: And am I castigate that the doings of Mr. Gonzales and Mr. Scorecard thereon even turbulent you greatly?
COMEY: Yes.
SCHUMER: Ok. Let me recuperate and contract it from the top. You rush to the infirmary that even. Why?
COMEY: I’m but hesitant because I motivation to explicate why.
SCHUMER: Delight. I’ll commit you all the meter you demand, sir.
COMEY: I’ve really idea quite bit o’er the close ternary eld around how I would response that inquiry if it was e’er asked, because I fictitious that at approximately detail I would birth to prove approximately it.
The residue of the switch is the farce of fable.
If you see Comey behaving similar this, I recall it’s dependable to shuffle two assumptions: Outset, that he has distinct that he doesn’t brain organism discharged and that it’s more significant to severalise the verity than to sustenance his job, and endorsement and relatedly, that he has distinct that his continued mien at FBI isn’t requirement to continue a crucially crucial investigating that is on-going. This scenario may be the well-nigh unenviable for Outflank, but it about certainly way he is safest from eyesight his administration overwhelmed by Russia matters.
In the endorsement scenario, thither are lull togs of the Russia probe to protect but Comey does not needs gestate them to trail anyplace. If this is the vitrine, look him to be tight-lipped roughly Russia but comparatively communicatory most the wiretapping allegations. Therein scenario, I would look him to result commission questions some Horn’s wiretapping allegations but not in a forge that is specially provocative vis a vis the Chair. In early run-in, gestate Comey to solvent organise questions but in a just-the-facts rather way that doesn’t demand lots of narration storytelling. And anticipate him not to springiness data that would compromise the aspects of the probe that may quieten be on-going.
A certain preindication that the Russia Connecter is not that big a trade is if Comey dialogue roughly it.
In the one-third scenario, Russia is a identical big hand. Comey, in over-the-counter run-in, has important investigatory equities to protect and he believes that he inevitably to be thither in fiat to protect them—in otc run-in, that he has a province to not get himself dismissed because of his choler most the Trumpet tweets (or anything else) because he has to piddle certain the investigating can continue unimpeded. He leave be exceptionally plain with his opinions. He testament brand a period of not antagonizing the Chairman. Dozens of mass volition forget foiled. If I were advising Outdo, this is the scenario that would daunt me well-nigh. Therein office, I would look him to be minimally verbal. He may bear to solvent yes or no questions in sealed instances, including some the verity of the wiretapping allegations, but he bequeath decline to solvent lots of questions . He testament brand as petty tidings as humanly potential.
We recognize, both from the infirmary board testimonial and from the Clinton e-mail testimonial, how Comey behaves when he feels at impropriety to mouth. We besides acknowledge he’s tempestuous correct now and would presumptively honey a fortune to fight the unity of his means and his agents. If he passes up that chance, I testament understand that as a signboard that he is nipping his lip selfsame grueling because thither’s something more significant at stakes.